VaultComplianceCyber security audit: what it covers and how to prepare
Compliance · Guide

Cyber security audit: what it covers and how to prepare

Cyber security audit: what it covers and how to prepare

Harry WestFounder & CEO21 October 202610 min read
Inside This Article
What is a cyber security audit?How is a cyber security audit different from an assessment, a penetration test or a certification?Which baseline should your cyber security audit use?What does a cyber security audit cover?Should an internal or independent auditor carry out your cyber security audit?How do you prepare for a cyber security audit?What happens after a cyber security audit?What should be on a cyber security audit checklist?What are the common mistakes in a cyber security audit?Frequently asked questions
Book a discovery call

Key takeaways

A cyber security audit independently checks your security controls against a defined baseline and reports the gaps with evidence. Choose the baseline from who asked: Cyber Essentials for UK central government and NHS supply chains, ISO 27001 Annex A for enterprise buyers, and the NCSC Cyber Assessment Framework for essential services. Prepare by agreeing scope, naming owners and collecting evidence first.

Cyber Essentials
The NCSC calls Cyber Essentials the Government's recommended minimum standard for organisations of all sizes, built on five controls: firewalls, secure configuration, security update management, user access control and malware protection.
Government contracts
Procurement Policy Note 014, published in February 2025, replaced PPN 09/14. It asks central government departments, their agencies and NHS bodies to require Cyber Essentials where a contract's risks justify it.
NCSC Cyber Assessment Framework
The NCSC designed the CAF primarily for organisations operating essential services. It sets out 14 principles, and each contributing outcome is judged achieved or not achieved, with partially achieved for some.
How UK businesses audit
The Cyber Security Breaches Survey 2025 found that 15% of UK businesses had carried out a cyber security vulnerability audit in the previous year, most of them using an external auditor.

An enterprise customer's security team has asked for evidence of an independent cyber security audit, and the contract is on hold until it arrives. Or your insurer's renewal form wants to know when you last had one. Either way, nobody has said what the audit should test against, and that is the question that decides whether the report gets accepted.

A cyber security audit independently checks your security controls against a defined baseline and reports the gaps with evidence. Choose the baseline from who asked: Cyber Essentials for UK central government and NHS supply chains, ISO 27001 Annex A for enterprise buyers, and the NCSC Cyber Assessment Framework for essential services.

This guide is for founders, CTOs and heads of IT at UK B2B tech firms with 25 to 250 staff. It covers how an audit differs from an assessment, a penetration test and a certification, and which baseline to pick. It then walks through scope, who should do the auditing, how to prepare, and what to do with the findings.

What is a cyber security audit?

A cyber security audit is a structured, evidence-based check of whether your security controls exist, are designed well and operate as described, measured against a stated baseline. The auditor samples records, interviews control owners and inspects configurations, then reports findings. Without a named baseline, the result is an opinion, not an audit.

The baseline is what makes an audit useful to someone else. "We had an audit" tells a buyer very little. "We were audited against ISO 27001 Annex A in March, with three findings closed" tells them what was tested and when.

Audits are still uncommon. The UK government's Cyber Security Breaches Survey 2025 surveyed 2,180 businesses. It found that 15% had carried out a cyber security vulnerability audit in the previous 12 months. A firm that can show a recent audit report is already ahead of most UK businesses on this measure.

How is a cyber security audit different from an assessment, a penetration test or a certification?

A cyber security audit tests controls against a baseline and reports findings with evidence. An assessment is broader and more advisory. A penetration test attacks specific systems to find technical weaknesses. A certification is a formal pass issued by an accredited or licensed body. Buyers use the four words loosely, so confirm which one they mean.

The table sets the four side by side. The right column is the one that matters in a deal: what the person asking can actually rely on.

Cyber security auditSecurity assessmentPenetration testCertification
Question it answersDo our controls meet this baseline, with evidence?Where are our biggest risks and gaps?Can an attacker get in through these systems?Has an approved body confirmed we meet the standard?
Measured againstA named baseline (Cyber Essentials, ISO 27001 Annex A, the NCSC CAF)Often a framework, sometimes the assessor's judgementThe systems in scope and a test planThe standard's requirements
Who performs itAn internal or independent auditorInternal team or adviserA specialist testerA certification body (for ISO 27001, one accredited by a body such as UKAS)
OutputFindings report with evidence and ratingsRisk and gap report with recommendationsTechnical findings with severity and fixesA certificate with a scope and expiry
What a buyer can rely onControls tested against a known baseline at a point in timeYour own view of your gapsTechnical exposure of named systemsThird-party confirmation under a scheme

A penetration test can sit inside a cyber security audit as one source of evidence, but it cannot replace one. Testing method belongs to the tester. NIST's Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment (SP 800-115) covers how to plan and run those tests. Our NIST SP 800-115 summary explains where it fits.

A penetration test tells you whether one door opens. An audit tells you whether anyone checks the doors.

Which baseline should your cyber security audit use?

Pick the baseline the person asking will accept. UK central government and NHS buyers look for Cyber Essentials, enterprise customers usually expect ISO 27001 Annex A, and operators of essential services are assessed against the NCSC Cyber Assessment Framework. For an insurer, ask which standard its proposal form follows before you commission anything.

Ask the requester one question before you scope: "Which standard would you like the audit to follow?" The answer saves weeks.

Who is askingBaseline that usually fitsWhy
UK central government department, agency or NHS bodyCyber Essentials, or Cyber Essentials PlusProcurement Policy Note 014 asks these bodies to require the scheme where a contract's risks justify it, such as handling government staff's personal information or supplying ICT that processes OFFICIAL data
Enterprise customer or its procurement teamISO 27001 Annex AAn internationally recognised standard that covers governance and suppliers as well as technical controls, and an audit against it is a first step towards certification, which also tests the management system around the controls
Regulator or competent authority for an essential serviceNCSC Cyber Assessment FrameworkThe NCSC designed the CAF primarily for organisations operating essential services, and it supports NIS Regulations compliance
Board or investorISO 27001 Annex A, or Cyber Essentials as a floorThe board wants a recognised yardstick it can track year on year
InsurerWhatever its proposal form followsInsurers set their own questions; match the audit to them

Cyber Essentials is, in the NCSC's words, "the minimum standard of cyber security recommended by the Government for organisations of all sizes". The NCSC Cyber Essentials overview lists five technical controls: firewalls, secure configuration, security update management, user access control and malware protection. Cyber Essentials Plus adds independent testing of your systems "to verify that those controls are working in practice". The government requirement now sits in Procurement Policy Note 014, published in February 2025 for procurements under the Procurement Act 2023. It replaced PPN 09/14 and PPN 09/23, and it asks buyers to apply the requirement where it is proportionate, not to every contract. Our Cyber Essentials page covers the scheme itself.

ISO 27001 Annex A is the reference set of controls behind ISO/IEC 27001:2022. Enterprise buyers ask for it because it covers governance and suppliers, not just technical hygiene.

The NCSC Cyber Assessment Framework (CAF) sets out four high-level objectives and 14 principles. The four objectives are managing security risk, protecting against cyber attacks, detecting cyber security events, and minimising the impact of cyber security incidents. The NCSC's introduction to the CAF explains that each contributing outcome is judged achieved or not achieved, with a partially achieved level for some outcomes. The current release is CAF version 4.0.

What does a cyber security audit cover?

A cyber security audit should cover seven areas: governance and policy, asset and access management, vulnerability and patching, backup and recovery, logging and monitoring, suppliers, and incident response. The chosen baseline decides how deep each area goes. Cyber Essentials stays technical, while ISO 27001 Annex A and the CAF reach into governance and suppliers.

The areas line up with the NCSC's 10 Steps to Cyber Security. Its components include risk management, asset management, identity and access management, vulnerability management, logging and monitoring, supply chain security and incident management. The table shows what an auditor typically asks for in each area.

AreaWhat the auditor checksEvidence that answers it
Governance and policyNamed ownership, approved policies, a risk assessment that is reviewedSigned policies, risk register with review dates, board or management minutes
Asset and access managementA current asset list; joiners, movers and leavers handled; admin rights limited; MFA in placeAsset inventory, access review records, leaver tickets matched to account removals
Vulnerability and patchingUpdates applied within a set time; scans run and acted onPatch reports, scan results with tickets showing the fixes
Backup and recoveryBackups taken, protected and restored in a testBackup logs, a dated restore test with its outcome
Logging and monitoringSecurity logs collected, kept and reviewed; alerts reach a personLog retention settings, alert examples, review records
SuppliersCritical suppliers known, assessed and bound by security termsSupplier list with risk ratings, contract clauses, review records
Incident responseA plan exists, people know their roles, and it has been exercisedIncident plan, exercise notes, incident log

Most findings come from the gap between a policy and its record. A leaver process that exists on paper but has no matching account removals is the classic example.

A policy without a record is a promise, not a control.

Should an internal or independent auditor carry out your cyber security audit?

Use an internal auditor to find and fix gaps cheaply, and an independent auditor when someone outside the business must rely on the result. Independence means the auditor did not design or run the controls being tested. Buyers, insurers and regulators give far more weight to an independent report than to a self-review.

Most UK businesses that audit already use outside help. The Cyber Security Breaches Survey 2025 looked at the 15% of businesses that carried out a vulnerability audit. Of those, 41% used an external audit only, 23% an internal audit only, and 32% both. Medium businesses were among the most likely to rely solely on external contractors (38%).

Independence matters even for internal audits. ISO 27001 Clause 9.2 expects internal audits to be run by competent, impartial auditors. Our Clause 9.2 internal audit guide shows how a firm of your size can achieve that without a permanent hire. Annex A 5.35 asks for information security to be reviewed independently on a planned cycle and after significant change. Our Annex A 5.35 page covers what that review involves.

We recommend a simple rule: if the report will leave the building, the auditor should come from outside the team that runs the controls. An engineer auditing their own firewall rules is a second pair of the same eyes.

How do you prepare for a cyber security audit?

Prepare for a cyber security audit in five steps. Agree the scope and baseline with whoever asked, name an owner for each area and collect evidence before the auditor requests it. Then fix the obvious gaps and book dates that leave time for remediation. Preparation turns the audit from a discovery exercise into a confirmation.

  1. Agree scope and baseline in writing. Confirm with the buyer, insurer or board which standard, which systems, which locations and which period the audit should cover. Write it down and send it back to them.
  2. Name an owner for each area. One person per area in the scope table above, with the authority to answer questions and the time to do it.
  3. Collect evidence first. Build a shared folder by area and fill it with the records listed in the table. Evidence you can produce in minutes reads very differently from evidence that arrives a week late.
  4. Close the obvious gaps. Missing MFA on admin accounts, an untested backup or an unsigned policy are cheaper to fix before the audit than to explain afterwards. If the gaps run deep, a structured gap analysis comes first.
  5. Set a realistic timeline. As GRCMANA planning guidance, allow two to four weeks for evidence gathering and quick fixes before a focused audit. Allow longer if policies or asset records do not yet exist. The audit itself depends on scope and on how quickly owners respond.

Automate the evidence you will need every year. Schedule access reviews, patch reports and backup tests so that they save their own records. The second audit is then far lighter than the first.

What happens after a cyber security audit?

After a cyber security audit, rate each finding by its effect on the person relying on the report, assign an owner and a date, and fix the highest-rated findings first. The remediation plan is what turns the report into progress. For most B2B tech firms, that plan becomes the route to ISO 27001 certification or Cyber Essentials Plus.

The rating scale below is GRCMANA guidance, not a requirement of any standard. Use whatever scale your auditor uses, but keep the link to consequence.

RatingWhat it meansTypical response
CriticalA control is missing and the gap is exploitable now, or the baseline cannot be metFix immediately; tell the requester if it affects them
HighA control exists but fails in practice, such as leavers keeping accessFix within weeks, with evidence of the fix
MediumA control works but evidence is weak or inconsistentFix the record-keeping before the next audit
LowAn improvement that would strengthen a working controlAdd to the roadmap

Send the requester a short summary, not just the report: the scope, the baseline, the findings by rating and the dated plan. A buyer reads a dated plan as maturity; an unexplained finding reads as risk.

When the next step is certification, the audit report becomes the starting point. Our ISO 27001 certification process guide sets out the stages from there.

What should be on a cyber security audit checklist?

A cyber security audit checklist should confirm the scope and baseline are agreed, owners are named, evidence exists for each of the seven areas, known gaps are fixed or planned, and the auditor's independence is settled. Use the short list below in the weeks before the audit, then keep it for next year's audit.

  • Scope and baseline agreed in writing with the requester
  • One named owner for each area, with time set aside
  • Current asset inventory, including cloud services and laptops
  • Access review completed, with leavers matched to account removals
  • MFA on admin and remote access accounts
  • Patch and vulnerability scan records for the audit period
  • A dated backup restore test with its result
  • Log retention settings and an example of an alert being handled
  • Supplier list with risk ratings and security clauses
  • Incident response plan and notes from its last exercise
  • Auditor independence confirmed for this scope
  • A place to record findings, owners and due dates

What are the common mistakes in a cyber security audit?

The common mistakes are auditing against no named baseline, letting the people who run controls audit themselves, treating a penetration test as the whole audit, and leaving findings without owners or dates. Each one produces a report that the person who asked for it cannot rely on, which defeats the purpose.

  • No baseline. A generic "health check" gives the buyer nothing to compare against. Name the standard before you book anyone.
  • Self-review dressed as independence. The same team designing, running and auditing a control cannot give an outside reader confidence.
  • A penetration test sent instead. It answers a narrower question. Send it as supporting evidence, not as the audit.
  • Findings without a plan. A report with no owners and dates ages badly. By the next renewal it reads as a list of things that were never done.

An audit is only as good as the baseline it is measured against.

Frequently asked questions

Our guidance at GRCMANA is at least once a year. Audit again after a significant change, such as a new platform, an acquisition or a major supplier switch. Annex A 5.35 of ISO 27001 expects independent review on a planned cycle and after significant change, but leaves the interval to you. An annual cycle also keeps your evidence current for the next buyer questionnaire.

Not quite. An IT audit can cover IT general controls, change management and service delivery for financial or operational purposes. A cyber security audit focuses on protecting systems and data against attack and recovering when something goes wrong. The two overlap on access, change and backup, and one set of evidence can serve both.

Yes, for internal improvement. A self-audit against Cyber Essentials or ISO 27001 Annex A is a cheap way to find gaps. When a buyer, insurer or regulator will rely on the result, use an independent auditor who did not design or run the controls being tested.

An audit on its own produces a findings report, not a certificate. Certification comes from a separate scheme. For Cyber Essentials, that means a certification body licensed by IASME. For ISO 27001, it means a certification body accredited by a national accreditation body such as UKAS. An audit is the usual preparation for either.

Profile image for Harry West, Founder and CEO of GRCMANA
Author

Harry West

Harry is the founder of GRCMANA, he helps regulated service providers close the enterprise trust gap — turning GRC, cyber resilience and AI governance from paperwork exercises into shippable systems.

Domain engine

Compliance reference directory.

Every guide in this domain, grouped by level — fundamentals, intermediate and advanced. Open any entry for its core practices, implementation steps and the evidence it produces.

01Fundamentals2 guides
Compliance frameworks: which ones a UK firm needs and in what order→Compliance management system: how a B2B tech firm manages every obligation it has taken on→
02Intermediate8 guides
Compliance reporting: what a B2B tech firm reports to customers, the board and investors→Audit readiness: how to be ready for any security or compliance audit→Compliance risk assessment: rank the obligations your customers and regulators hold you to→Compliance training for tech suppliers: what customers and auditors expect, who needs it, and how to prove it→Compliance monitoring: run a programme that keeps customer and audit promises→Cyber security audit: what it covers and how to prepare→Compliance policy: what a B2B tech supplier's policy must cover→Compliance audit: every audit a B2B supplier faces, and how to run them from one evidence base→
03Advanced3 guides
Compliance programme: how a B2B tech firm builds one its regulated customers trust→Control mapping: how to map one control set across several frameworks→Regulatory change management: horizon scanning and an obligations register for a lean firm→
Compliance Accelerator

Ready to meet every framework with one set of controls?

Work with a Trust Architect to map your obligations, choose the right frameworks in the right order, and build a programme that satisfies auditors and enterprise buyers alike.

Book a call →
GRCMANA
  • About
  • Insights
  • Contact
Ask the Trust ArchitectBook a Call →
  • About
  • Insights
  • The Vault
    Compliance VaultCyber Essentials→ISO 27001→SOC 2→ISO 42001→
    Domain VaultGRC Fundamentals→Risk Management→AI Governance→GRC Engineering→
    Other ResourcesFree Tools→Templates→Newsletter→
  • Contact
Book a Call →Ask the Trust ArchitectFixed fee. ISO 27001 in as few as six weeks.
GRCMANA

Helping high-growth B2B tech startups close the Enterprise Trust Gap through security, governance, and AI resilience.

ISO 27001ISO 42001ISO 9001Cyber EssentialsEU AI Act ReadyNIST AI RMF

The Vault

GRC EngineeringAI GovernanceISO 27001ISO 42001All Vault Resources

Resources

BlogFree ToolsTemplatesNewsletter

Company

About GRCMANAContactPrivacy PolicyTerms & ConditionsCookie Policy
© 2025 GRCMANA · All rights reservedRegistered in England & Wales under company registration 16810805. VAT Registration 506308024