GRC implementation: how to build a GRC programme in your first 90 days
GRC implementation means turning governance, risk and compliance from scattered tasks into one operating cycle with named owners. GRCMANA recommends that a firm of 25 to 250 people builds the core in about 90 days, in a fixed order: obligations, owners, risks, controls, policies, then reporting. Tool purchases, a second framework and automation wait until that cycle runs.
Your largest prospect's security review has come back with a page of questions, and nobody owns the answers. A client audit left findings that are still open. The board wants to know who is in charge of risk, and GRC implementation has just become your job.
This guide is for the newly accountable Head of Compliance, Head of Security, COO or CTO at a UK B2B technology firm of 25 to 250 people that sells into regulated industries. It sets out a 90-day sequence: where your obligations come from, what to do in each 30-day phase, who owns what, and what to leave until the basics run.
GRC implementation means turning governance, risk and compliance from scattered tasks into one operating cycle with named owners. A firm of 25 to 250 people can stand up the core in about 90 days by working in a fixed order: obligations, owners, risks, controls, policies, then reporting. Each step feeds the next one.
The order matters more than the tooling. Owners come before risks, because a risk without an owner never gets treated. Controls come before policies, because a policy should describe what the firm actually does, not what it hopes to do.
This page assumes you already know what GRC is and need to build the programme. It stays with the sequence and links out for the detail behind each step.
A B2B technology supplier's GRC obligations come from four places: customer contracts and their security schedules, the standard you certify or report against, UK GDPR, and, for suppliers to financial services, the contract terms DORA requires those clients to impose. Most of them arrive through a customer, not a regulator.
UK-regulated clients bring their own duties as well. The FCA's SYSC 4.1.1R requires firms to have a clear organisational structure with well defined lines of responsibility, and effective processes to identify, manage, monitor and report their risks. Their supplier questionnaires follow from that.
Your first regulator is usually a customer's procurement team.
A 90-day GRC implementation plan runs in three 30-day phases. Days 1 to 30 build the obligations register, fix the scope and name owners. Days 31 to 60 add the risk register, a control baseline and a minimum policy set. Days 61 to 90 set the reporting cadence, hold the first management review and start the evidence routine.
| Phase | Focus | Outputs by the end | Done when |
|---|---|---|---|
| Days 1 to 30 | Obligations, scope and owners | An obligations register, a scope statement and a named owner for each area | Every obligation has a source and an owner |
| Days 31 to 60 | Risks, controls and policies | A risk register with treatment decisions, a control baseline mapped to ISO 27001 or SOC 2, and a minimum policy set | Each top risk links to a control and an owner |
| Days 61 to 90 | Reporting, review and evidence | A reporting cadence, minutes from the first management review, and an evidence calendar | The board has had its first report and the first evidence is filed |
We recommend treating 90 days as the time to get the cycle running, not to finish it. A certificate or an attestation report comes later, once your controls have run long enough to leave evidence.
Days 1 to 30 are about knowing what you owe and who owns it. Build an obligations register from your contracts, your target standard, UK GDPR and any terms your clients impose. Fix the scope: the products, teams and locations the programme covers. Then name one owner for each obligation area before any other work starts.
The obligations register needs a working first version here, not a finished system. Keeping it current as contracts and laws change is the job of a compliance management system, which can follow once the cycle runs.
Days 31 to 60 turn obligations into a managed set of risks and controls. Build a risk register and decide a treatment for each top risk. Map a control baseline to your chosen standard, ISO 27001 or SOC 2, and write the minimum set of policies those controls need. Each risk, control and policy gets an owner from phase one.
A policy that describes what nobody does is a finding waiting for an auditor.
Days 61 to 90 make the programme repeat. Set a reporting cadence to the executive team and the board, hold the first management review, and start an evidence routine so that proof of each control is collected as the work happens. By day 90 the cycle has run once, and everyone knows when it runs again.
The first review also sets the agenda for the next 90 days. Its findings show which controls are not working, which gaps are still open and which manual steps repeat often enough to be worth automating later. Improving the programme is that loop, run every cycle, not a separate project.
In a lean GRC programme, one person leads, an executive sponsors, and the people who already run each process own its controls. A firm of 25 to 250 people rarely needs a dedicated GRC team. It needs clear names for who sets direction, who coordinates the programme, and who does the work each control describes.
| Role | Usually held by | Owns |
|---|---|---|
| Executive sponsor | The CEO, COO or another director | Budget, risk appetite and the board report |
| GRC lead | The Head of Compliance, Head of Security or CTO | The registers, the 90-day plan and the reporting cadence |
| Control owners | Engineering, IT, HR and finance leads | Running their controls and producing the evidence |
| Data protection lead | A DPO or privacy lead, where you have one | UK GDPR duties and processor contracts |
| Board | The directors | Oversight, challenge and the decisions only a board can take |
The table is a starting point, not an organisation chart. In a firm of 30 people one person may hold two rows; what matters is that every row has a name.
Defer three things until the core cycle runs: buying a GRC tool, adding a second framework, and automating any process that is not yet defined. Each one is worth doing later. Done first, each one multiplies the work, because it fixes a process in place before you know what the process should be.
Fit GRC into the business by attaching each review to a meeting, plan or process that already exists, rather than running a parallel calendar. Put risk on the leadership agenda, tie control changes to your change process, and update obligations when contracts are signed. Integrated GRC shows up where decisions are already being made.
GRC programmes stall for five common reasons: nobody owns them, teams work in silos, the framework is chosen before the obligations are known, a tool is bought before the process exists, and the board never sees a report. Most are sequencing problems, and the 90-day order is built to avoid all five.
A programme the board never hears about is a project with no end date.
We recommend planning 90 days to get the core cycle running in a firm of 25 to 250 people. Three things stretch it: a scope wider than the products customers buy, two frameworks started at once, and owners who have no time set aside for the work. Agree the scope and the owners' time before day 1.
Start with your obligations, not a framework or a tool. Read the security schedules in your three largest customer contracts first. They tell you which standard customers expect, which terms carry deadlines, and which gaps put revenue at risk.
Not at the start. Shared documents can hold the registers and evidence for a first cycle. A tool earns its cost once the process is defined and the number of owners, controls and frameworks makes manual tracking slow. When you do choose one, check that it can import the registers you already have, map one control to more than one framework, and export your evidence if you leave.
One named person should lead it, usually the Head of Compliance, Head of Security or CTO, with an executive sponsor who can make decisions. The lead should not also audit the programme. ISO 27001 expects internal audits from an impartial auditor, so plan early for someone outside the work, such as a colleague from another team or an external auditor. The Cyber Governance Code of Practice also asks boards to define roles clearly, including ownership of cyber at executive and non-executive director level.
Every guide in this domain, grouped by level — fundamentals, intermediate and advanced. Open any entry for its core practices, implementation steps and the evidence it produces.
Work with a Trust Architect to design a GRC programme that fits a 25 to 250-person firm: scoped, owned and built to run all year rather than in a scramble before each audit.